Huawei has fired the latest salvo in its battle with the US, confirming it has brought a lawsuit against the US government over a ban on its telecommunications equipment.
The company made the announcement during a press conference at its headquarters in Shenzhen, China, on Thursday local time. The lawsuit has been brought in the US District Court in the Eastern District of Texas (its US headquarters is located in Plano, Texas).
Speaking about the legal action, Huawei Deputy Chairman Guo Ping said the US Congress had failed to present “any evidence” for its ban on Huawei products and equipment and was thus “unconstitutional.”
“[The ban] prevents us from serving our US customers, damages our reputation and deprives us of an opportunity to serve customers outside the United States,” Guo said. “It violates separation of power principles, breaks US legal traditions and goes against the very nature of the US Constitution.”
“Huawei are prepared to take this legal action as a proper and last resort.”
The legal challenge comes down to an addition to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which President Donald Trump signed last year. The bill prohibits the US government and its contractors from buying certain telecommunications and video surveillance equipment from Huawei as well as a handful of other Chinese communications companies, including ZTE. The ban covers components and services deemed “essential” or “critical” to any government system.
In the press conference, Guo defended the companys record on national security, reiterating that Huawei was a world leader in telecommunications, particularly in 5G.
Huaweis Global Cybersecurity and Privacy Officer John Suffolk also took to the stage to reiterate that in recent years, when malware attacks like Petya and WannaCry have represented a global threat, “none of that was coming from Huawei.”
“[The] global supply chain generates many thousands of weaknesses and vulnerabilities,” Suffolk said. “In 2017 and 2018 alone, there were 30,000 such published vulnerabilities, from companies who do publish vulnerabilities. Nine out of the top 10 organisations publishing vulnerabilities were American companies.”
Huaweis Chief Legal Officer Song Liuping also noted that Huawei hadnt had a chance to defend its “excellent security record” because the ban had come into effect without due legal process.
“Huawei has never had the chance to cross examine its accusers … US Congress has simply attacked as lawmaker, prosecutor and juror at the same time, contrary to the American constitution,” Song said.
Huawei is seeking a permanent injunction on the NDAA restrictions and a declaratory judgement that the restrictions are unconstitutional.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:
“[We are willing to] work with the US president and his administration to find a solution where Huawei products are available to the American people and the national security of the United States is fully protected,” Song said.
Galaxy S10 Plus review: No doubt about it, the Galaxy S10 Plus is going to be one of the best Android phones of 2019.
5G and foldable phones go big at MWC 2019: With international intrigue and a 5G coming-out party, this show doesn’t need the boost of a Samsung event